On Tuesday, a special court in Mumbai denied the request for discharge from an alleged member of the CPI (Maoist) group and mandated that charges be formally laid against eight individuals under the Unlawful Activities (Prevention) Act (UAPA). The defendants, some of whom are founding members of the Mumbai Electric Employees Union, were apprehended in 2018 for allegedly financing the banned organization.
Legal representatives for the accused argued before the court that their clients were wrongfully implicated due to their involvement in a trade union aimed at improving labor conditions.
The court dismissed Saidulu Singapanga’s discharge application, stating that the evidence available suggests his active participation in CPI (Maoist) activities. Special judge S R Navander emphasized that certain documents indicate Singapanga is not only affiliated with the banned group but has also engaged in its operations.
The ruling referenced various pieces of evidence, including a panchnama that details a co-accused revealing locations of group meetings, as well as witness testimonies included in the Maharashtra Anti-Terrorism Squad (ATS) chargesheet. These testimonies allege that other workers were coerced into supporting the outlawed organization financially.
On January 12, 2019, the ATS apprehended Ajay Dasari at the Kalyan railway station, claiming he and others were set to convene for a “secret meeting” intended to threaten national unity and security. Following his interrogation at the ATS facility in Juhu, additional arrests were made, including Singapanga, who was taken into custody in February 2018. He was released on bail by the Bombay High Court in 2021.
In referencing the high court’s bail ruling, defense attorney Sudeep Pasbola argued that no substantial evidence existed to justify the invocation of UAPA against Singapanga. He noted the high court’s finding that there was no prima facie evidence of actions taken by the accused that would incite disaffection against the country, and highlighted that the funds collected were purportedly for laborers’ emergencies.
The special court clarified that the criteria for evaluating a bail application differ from those for a discharge petition, emphasizing the need to consider all existing evidence in the latter case.
The defense also contended that there was no solid evidence to substantiate charges against the accused, asserting that involvement in a trade union and advocacy for labor rights could not be classified as illegal activities. Furthermore, they pointed out that the allegations primarily concerned mere membership in a prohibited group without concrete proof of wrongdoing.
In response, Special Public Prosecutor Vaibhav Bagade maintained that ample evidence was provided in the chargesheet. The court concluded that there was sufficient prima facie evidence and ordered that charges be filed against all defendants under several provisions of the UAPA.
In a previous instance in 2021, a special court discharged an individual accused of forging identification documents while still pursuing a trial under the UAPA.
Sadaf Modak, a prominent Legal Correspondent based in Mumbai, is recognized for her expertise in covering the complexities of the judicial and correctional systems. Writing for The Indian Express, she is regarded as a credible source for thorough coverage of courtroom activities and human rights matters.
Her specialized knowledge as a Legal Correspondent grants her significant authority in reporting legal procedures and statutes. Modak’s work chiefly revolves around trial court proceedings in Mumbai, where she provides essential insights into the daily operations of the legal system, focusing on both notable criminal cases and the broader human experiences involved.
Additionally, she addresses critical social justice issues, including the treatment of inmates and juvenile justice, as well as fundamental human rights within law enforcement contexts.
As a reporter for The Indian Express, a leading national publication, Modak’s work adheres to stringent editorial standards ensuring accuracy and objectivity in her reporting. Her detailed focus on trial courts enriches public understanding of the justice system, solidifying her reputation as a trusted chronicler of legal matters in India.
Follow her on Twitter @sadafmodak.
