The recent rise of the Green Party has highlighted a significant aspect of British politics: the tendency to dismiss left-leaning individuals as credible political figures. This was evident over the weekend during an interview between Green Party leader Zack Polanski and Sky News host Trevor Phillips, who showed clear disdain throughout the exchange.
In a prior conversation with the Haaretz newspaper, Polanski addressed the alarming increase in antisemitic incidents targeting Jewish establishments in the UK. He expressed his concern, noting examples such as arson attacks on ambulances, and emphasized that many in the Jewish community are feeling increasingly unsafe. He suggested that it is worth discussing whether this sense of insecurity is based on perception or reality, but insisted that both scenarios are unacceptable.
However, Phillips misrepresented Polanski’s statements, suggesting that Polanski claimed these threats were imaginary. In reality, Polanski indicated that pro-Palestine demonstrations are seen as threatening by some Jewish individuals while others, including himself, may not feel the same way.
Polanski raised a pertinent question that likely resonated with many viewers: “Why is my Jewish identity being erased from this conversation?” Phillips’s response was strikingly dismissive: “Don’t try that one on me!” He continued to assert that “many” Jewish people hold different views from Polanski’s without acknowledging the experiences of the Jewish leader in front of him. He ignored Polanski’s accounts of personal antisemitism, including two arrests related to incidents during a Green Party rally disrupted by right-wing activists, and also neglected Polanski’s mention of a caricature in the Times that invoked a well-known antisemitic stereotype.
If a Jewish leader from the Labour or Conservative parties had received such treatment, it would likely provoke widespread outrage. Yet, because Polanski identifies as both Jewish and left-wing, he seems to be regarded as a political figure unworthy of respect or acknowledgment.
This pattern of disregard was not limited to Phillips; other journalists echoed similar sentiments. Times columnist Janice Turner claimed that Polanski uses his Jewish identity as a “political shield.” Following the interview on Sky News, another Times columnist, Melanie Phillips, who is also Jewish, labeled Polanski a “menace to public safety” and suggested he was exploiting his Jewish heritage to deflect criticism.
This line of reasoning could also apply to prominent Jewish Israeli scholars like Omer Bartov, who has extensively studied genocide and asserted his ability to identify such acts clearly.
Moreover, these attacks on Polanski’s political stance also serve to undermine the Palestinian rights he advocates for. Melanie Phillips has previously argued that supporting the Palestinian cause equates to endorsing anti-Jewish hatred. At a recent event, she controversially claimed that “there is no such thing as the Palestinian people” and insisted that only Jews possess any entitlement to the land.
This situation illustrates a troubling dynamic within British political discourse: one can express nearly any opinion on Palestinians—no matter how incendiary—without fear of career repercussions. Conversely, advocating against their oppression invites vilification.
The day after his contentious interview with Polanski, Trevor Phillips appeared on Times Radio, where he claimed that there exists an “Islamist community” intent on harming Jews, suggesting that the Green Party receives support from this group. He expressed concern that the party fears alienating this minority by denouncing antisemitism.
On the face of it, Phillips’s assertions are nonsensical. Why would extremists intent on violence support a secular party led by a gay Jewish man, known for its progressive social policies? His claims also contradict the Green Party’s explicit denunciations of antisemitism.
While there have been accusations of antisemitic behavior by some Green Party members, which led to their suspension, these incidents represent a minuscule fraction of a party that has expanded significantly, now boasting nearly 230,000 members. To generalize these isolated cases to tarnish the reputation of a party founded on anti-racist principles, as the Daily Mail has done, is disingenuous.
Nevertheless, Trevor Phillips is unlikely to face scrutiny over these points. He can maintain his image as an unbiased broadcaster because his bias aligns with what is deemed acceptable. In the prevailing political climate, those on the left are often not recognized as legitimate political actors, allowing for a wider latitude in criticism.
Owen Jones is a columnist for The Guardian.
If you have thoughts on the issues discussed in this article, you can submit a response of up to 300 words via email for potential publication in our letters section.
