Australia is once again facing a critical moment regarding the safety of women, as discussions around violence and sexual assault allegations take center stage in national discourse.
The recent surge in these issues has prompted government leaders to pledge enhanced action. While their dedication to addressing these concerns is evident, it is essential to question whether the challenge lies more in execution rather than identifying solutions. Despite numerous recommendations and substantial financial investments, it appears that the implementation of effective measures remains a significant hurdle.
Furthermore, new forms of abuse are emerging more rapidly than legislation can adapt. In a recent meeting, the national cabinet recognized that rates of intimate partner homicide and sexual violence are still “unacceptably high.” They established key priorities for a new five-year strategy aimed at addressing these problems.
States and territories are expected to provide updates later this year on their initiatives related to sexual violence, judicial responses, education on respectful relationships, standards for behavioral change among men, emergency housing, and alcohol regulations. Additionally, they have agreed to a new national framework for assessing risks associated with family and domestic violence, ensuring that warning signs are consistently recognized across different jurisdictions when individuals approach police, healthcare providers, or hospitals.
However, states will have a two-year period to synchronize their systems, which raises questions about the urgency of this approach.
As Australia reaches the midpoint of its 10-year national plan aimed at eradicating violence against women and children, which aspires to eliminate gender-based violence “in one generation,” it is a pertinent time to evaluate the achievements of the first five years and identify necessary adjustments for the next phase.
This sentiment is echoed by a group of crossbench MPs who recently contacted Prime Minister Anthony Albanese. They contend that despite extensive inquiries and funding, the government has yet to provide a clear account of how financial resources are allocated and whether these interventions are effective in reducing harm.
Parliamentarians such as Allegra Spender, Dai Le, Helen Haines, and Andrew Wilkie advocate for empowering the Domestic, Family and Sexual Violence Commission by transforming it into a statutory body. This change would endow the commission with the authority to gather information, monitor the execution of recommendations, and audit expenditures, ultimately providing a clearer understanding of successful strategies. They believe that accountability for the nine governments responsible for combating this issue is essential.
Spender emphasizes that granting the commission the ability to evaluate the efficacy of policies could be the catalyst for the meaningful changes communities desire.
While implementation remains a key factor in Australia’s approach to addressing family, domestic, and sexual violence, the nature of these threats is evolving. Although the existing plan was developed only a few years ago, the rapid transformation of the online landscape necessitates an urgent response.
Chanel Contos, founder of the advocacy group Teach Us Consent, has initiated a campaign urging the federal government to address social media algorithms by implementing an “opt-in” model for users. She warns that the content served to young boys and men often portrays women and minorities as scapegoats for their problems.
Contos explains that although the connection between social media algorithms and violence against women and children may not be immediately apparent, the underlying profit-driven model thrives on generating outrage and strong emotional responses. “Young boys and men are prime targets for that,” she asserts.
While she acknowledges the government’s broader efforts, Contos insists that without addressing algorithmic issues, the government is not genuinely tackling the most pressing concerns affecting young people. She notes the evident harm these algorithms inflict, particularly on women, who often bear the brunt of this negative impact.
Another instance of technology outpacing regulatory measures is the rise of wearable smart devices, such as glasses capable of covertly recording video. These items, often referred to as “creepy” or “pervert glasses,” have been utilized to create invasive online content featuring women in various public settings.
Gina Martin, who successfully campaigned against upskirting in England, is currently advocating against the sale of “surveillance glasses” by Kmart, priced at $89. Her petition to remove these products from the market has garnered over 56,000 signatures, as she believes such technology should not be available, especially when legal protections have not yet caught up.
In response, Attorney-General Michelle Rowland has urged the privacy commissioner to prioritize the issue of smart glasses, considering the risks they pose to women and children. She stated that the government is advancing its privacy reform initiatives to ensure that laws are suited for the digital age.
However, the sale of these devices continues unabated, highlighting the ongoing challenges in addressing emerging technologies.
Social Services Minister Tanya Plibersek expressed her grave concern regarding the alarming rise in sexual violence among individuals under 18 years of age. She recognizes that the upcoming five-year national action plan on violence against women and children must not only address persistent failures in law enforcement and housing but also adapt to the evolving landscape of violence.
