Nesrine Malik’s analysis of “Woke 1.0” strikes me as more intricate and focused than the responses it has garnered (Letters, 24 August). While it may indeed exhibit elements of puritanism and dogmatism, to dismiss it on these grounds overlooks Malik’s important reminder not to “trivialize and dismiss movements that resonated globally, and which had safety, dignity, and equal opportunity at their heart.”

Contrary to being labeled as “crazy,” the term “Woke 1.0” embodies the passionate expression of the younger generation who emerged from the radical “permissive” era on both sides of the Atlantic. They were empowered to believe that their voices could effect change in the world. Educated in human rights like no previous generation, they were introduced to activism through historical examples, fueled by a sense of justice and integrity. They proudly showcased their convictions and were willing to confront the inevitable backlash, much like their celebrated countercultural predecessors.

Malik compellingly asserts that the way we “frame” this activism shapes our understanding of its objectives. This framing has largely been influenced by right-wing reactionaries, who have created an environment conducive to the revival of attitudes and beliefs that a previous progressive generation fought vigorously to eliminate.

Paul McGilchrist
Cromer, Norfolk

Do you have thoughts on any articles you’ve read in the Guardian today? We invite you to share your views via email for consideration in our letters section.