The seafood sector is grappling with a persistent challenge: American consumers have historically shown little interest in fish. While many Americans enjoy canned cheese products and even spread marshmallow fluff on sandwiches, they appear hesitant when it comes to eating seafood. On average, an American consumes around 19 pounds (less than 9 kilograms) of fish annually, starkly lower than the global average of 45 pounds. In contrast, Icelanders are leading the way in seafood consumption, averaging about 200 pounds per person each year, ensuring they get ample omega-3 fatty acids.
However, there may be a shift on the horizon as the seafood industry devises innovative strategies to penetrate the U.S. market. Much like the clever techniques used to incorporate vegetables into meals for discerning young eaters, the new approach aims to present fish in a more appealing manner. The concept is to transform fish into products that resemble meat, such as tuna engineered to look like chicken nuggets and salmon designed to mimic beef jerky. This isn’t exactly plant-based meat; it’s being marketed as Fishy Meat™.
This concept is not entirely unprecedented; plant-based meat gained significant traction when it was strategically placed in the meat section rather than relegated to the vegetarian aisle. Similarly, seafood products marketed as meat alternatives, like tuna steaks and salmon burgers, have existed for some time. Recent reports from the Seafood Expo indicate that this discreet marketing of seafood is gaining momentum.
The reasoning behind this strategy is clear; it holds the potential for success. However, whether it’s environmentally sustainable for the 348 million inhabitants of the U.S. to dramatically increase their seafood intake is a different matter altogether. While lighthearted puns about seafood may be entertaining, the sobering realities of overfishing and environmental degradation cannot be ignored. Guardian columnist George Monbiot has raised significant concerns about the sustainability of fish and shellfish consumption, arguing that if we genuinely wish to protect our oceans, we ought to refrain from eating fish. “If you really want to make a difference, stop eating fish,” he stated.
Despite the complexities surrounding cost and environmental impact, there’s a possibility that the U.S. may respond to this advice, even if not for ethical reasons. The appeal of disguising fish as meat may be moot if affordability becomes a barrier. With food inflation already a pressing issue, further exacerbated by tariffs and geopolitical tensions, the accessibility of Fishy Meat could be compromised. Should supply chains falter due to ongoing conflicts, the American diet could shift away from seafood altogether.
Arwa Mahdawi is a columnist for the Guardian.
Join Mehdi Hasan and Arwa Mahdawi on June 8 for a discussion on the significant shifts in global politics, the worrying rise of populism and nationalism, and their worldwide repercussions. The event will take place in London and will be livestreamed globally; tickets are available here.
If you have thoughts on the topics discussed in this article, you are invited to submit a response of up to 300 words via email for consideration in our letters section. Click here for more details.
