The Esplanade in Surfers Paradise is set to become a permanent pedestrian-only area following a successful extended trial period. This development comes as part of a larger initiative by the Gold Coast City Council aimed at revitalizing the Surfers Paradise precinct, with a total investment of $100 million planned to commence in late 2027.
During a recent council meeting, concerns were voiced by a local councillor regarding the adequacy of traffic impact assessments related to the changes. A specific 250-meter stretch of the Esplanade near Cavill Avenue will be off-limits to vehicles indefinitely, transitioning into a space designed for foot traffic after an eight-month evaluation period.
Councillor Darren Taylor emphasized the necessity of making tough decisions for the long-term prosperity of Surfers Paradise, stating, “The enduring success of this area hinges not on vehicle access but on creating an inviting environment for visitors to enjoy.” Surveys conducted by the council from 2019 to 2025 indicated that many residents found Surfers Paradise to be “tired” and lacking appeal.
According to Cr Taylor, design initiatives for the extensive revitalization of the Surfers Paradise mall and foreshore are anticipated to begin in 2027-28. The planned upgrades aim to transform the area into a vibrant, tree-lined boulevard conducive to walking, socializing, and relaxation.
Community surveys revealed that 72 percent of respondents supported the closure, highlighting improvements in pedestrian safety, economic prospects, and overall visitor experience. The trial phase featured outdoor movie nights, live music, and added amenities such as hammocks and a sandpit.
While nearly half of the local businesses initially opposed the trial, support grew to 71 percent after modifications were made to alleviate traffic issues on nearby roads. However, a significant debate arose during the council meeting, with Councillor Brooke Patterson challenging Mayor Tom Tate over the sufficiency of traffic impact data provided by council staff. “To permanently close a road that serves 9,000 commuters daily is not a trivial matter,” she argued.
Patterson expressed concern that the analysis did not adequately address how neighboring roads, which are already at capacity, would be affected. “While the council anticipates increased traffic on Bundall Road, there is a lack of detailed volume modeling or peak hour stress testing,” she noted.
In response, council CEO Tim Baker asserted confidence in the data available, suggesting that only minor delays of approximately nine seconds are expected on Bundall Road. He added that there had been ample opportunity for councillors to engage in discussions regarding the motion.
Paul Wallis, assistant manager of the Surfers Paradise Surf Life Saving Club, reported a 20 percent increase in business growth since expanding outdoor seating onto the Esplanade. He expressed optimism that the permanent closure would ultimately benefit local businesses. “Once finalized, more businesses along the esplanade will thrive as a result,” he stated.
Conversely, local businessman Robert Luxford described the closure as disastrous for the economy, citing significant declines in trade and the potential financial strain on local operators. “We have businesses facing severe losses, and the claim of a 68 percent increase in foot traffic is misleading,” he argued, attributing the increase to external factors such as recent weather events.
On the other hand, Upper Coomera resident Margaret Neve noted that the closure had not adversely affected her access and appreciated the tranquility of the area. “It offers a peaceful escape from the hustle and bustle of daily life,” she remarked, adding that access via public transport is convenient.
Local resident Casper Van Niekerk mentioned that he had not observed a change in traffic congestion but suggested enhancements such as added shade and greenery along the walkway. “It’s a safer environment for families, and navigating the area is easier without the presence of traffic lights,” he concluded, describing the initiative as a work in progress.
